![]() ![]() If you are working in the Raspberry Pi desktop environment, launch Pure Data from the toolbar: So, for example: puredata -alsa -audioadddev pisound -audiobuf 10 -channels 2 -r 48000 -alsamidi -mididev 1,2,3,4 You can have more than one, for example -mididev 1,2,3,4 creates 4. You may need longer audiobuf depending on your system. If you are going to run Pure Data from the command line - either from scripts you write, or from a shell in the desktop, here are the options you need: ![]() The Pisound button feature, and the Pisound control mobil app both have built-in support for Pure Data, and launch it correctly set up for Pisound. ![]() Running Pisound button & control mobile app For some unknown reason, the package for gem recommends pulling in a full PDF rendering system! Hence, the -no-install-recommends. Note: This is a much smaller install than what the pisound-config installs. Install with: sudo apt-get install -no-install-recommends puredata gem It is most similar to Max (is sort its cousin), but is open source, and a bit more “bare bones”. Good luck.Pure Data (or just Pd) is a visual programming system for multimedia. Apple is notorious for disrespecting its customers, especially in music software, so don't be surprised by what you find out. There are several free test tone apps available for iTunes and Pure Music, these are useful tools. If that doesn't work, contact Pure Music. Sometimes these nasty EQ functions show up as "loudness", "dynamic range", or "car mode" settings hidden inside other functions. ![]() I suggest you search for all the possible ways that iTunes might impose EQ on Pure Music and find out if any exist on your system. File corruption isn't the most common reason for issues like this, but it is common: digital files, especially those in flash memory, degrade like everything else in life. Pure Music doesn't have EQ settings, but it is either triggering them in iTunes, Audio Midi, or you have corruption in your Pure Music file. You have a software problem, so do not expect it to improve by changing hardware. I drafted an answer but CA deleted it because of faulty software, so this will be short. Also, I wonder if it makes a difference in re: to the type/style of music being listened to? My preference is Christian Contemporary Worship that's in the pop/rock/punk catagory w/ ballads too. No where in Lafayette, IN to listen for myself. However, I could use some advice on which DAC to use. I wonder if this problem would work itself out if I sampled some ADAM Audio A3X's w/ a Sub7 along w/ a regular DAC rather than my AQ Dragonfly "headphone amp". They both sound heavy with bass but Pure Music has much stronger bass than TIDAL. I picked a track and listened to it both through TIDAL and from a cd in iTunes w/ Pure Music. For example, "Crazy Love" on Paul Simon's Graceland album might work. Listen to a track with lots of deep but high-quality bass which you know pretty well. Watch out for different masterings of the performance, use only one. Let's find out where that excess bass originates. Have you compared a track on a CD to the *exact* same track running through the streaming path? Or compared to an mp3 version purchased from Amazon? And you can try a pure iTunes version too, all the info is useful. Okay, the first job is to isolate the problem. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |